Webster’s dictionary defines miracles as an extraordinary event manifesting divine
intervention in human affairs or an
extremely outstanding or unusual event, thing, or accomplishment. Certain
fibers that have been considered “miracle fibers” include organic cotton,
bamboo, and industrial hemp. These fibers also have several controversies that
surround them, such as contamination during the production process,
mislabeling, and the most controversial issue of one being illegal to produce.
These controversies lead to the question: Are these fibers truly miracle fibers
or not?
The first controversy I found to be
important is the issue of contamination within organic cotton that is discussed
in the article “Controversy Broiling; GM Cotton Against Organic”. This article
describes how organic cotton in developing countries can easily be
contaminated. To fix this issue certain third party certification systems have
began to develop. These certification systems closely monitor the production of
the cotton to assure there is no contamination. They make visits to monitor the
crops as well as require specific papers to be filled completed. The main
problem now is based off the fact that clothing brands purchase their cotton
from multiple producers and some of the cotton may be contaminated.
The contamination also relates to the
controversial issue of mislabeling. As the new “green movement” has taken wind,
some consumers are looking for items that use natural fibers. Certain man-made
fibers such as rayon use the natural resource of bamboo and according to the
pamphlet “Are You Being Bamboozled?” certain brands are labeling the use of
rayon within a garment as bamboo to help their products be more appealing to
these consumers. The main problem with this is that the production of rayon
uses multiple toxic chemicals that eliminate any natural antimicrobial
properties that can be found within the bamboo plant. These chemicals are also
strong air pollutants that are “not considered to be eco-friendly”.
A miracle fiber that is considered to be
eco-friendly also stimulates much controversy within our country, as it is
illegal under federal law and several state laws. The movie Hempsters: Plant the Seed and the
article “Hemp: Historical Fiber Remains Controversial” discuss multiple reasons
as to why this fiber is sustainable and should be legalized. Both of these medias
tell of how hemp is a plant that can with stand droughts and does not require
many if any pesticides. They also discuss how this plant has been produced for
thousands of years and been used in many different materials throughout that
time, such as garments, bricks, and paper. The opposing groups of people who
believe hemp should not be legalized argue that this plant is similar to its
“cousin” plant marijuana and would be difficult for law enforcement to tell the
difference between the two crops.
I believe that all of these controversies
relate to the lack of knowledge available to the consumer. It has often been
said that people do not like what they do not know or understand. I believe
that these fibers can be called miracle fibers, as they are natural resources
that can help to better our lives. We need to recognize the positives and the
negatives of these fibers to develop solutions to the problems that are
stimulating controversies.
Great post, Chayla! You provided a lot of background information concerning the controversies that surround these particular fibers, which was a great touch. This allows the reader to be fully aware of the situation with the production of materials globally. I agree that we need to identify the pros and cons of fibers to fully understand and be able to improve the way they impact the environment.
ReplyDeleteChayla,
ReplyDeleteYour first sentence it great at drawing the reader in, good job! Your post was great and provides a lot of interesting information! I agree with you that these controversies are because of lack of knowledge available to the consumer. Do you have any specific ideas of how they could better inform the consumer?
That's a good question. I think that we could possibly inform the consumer with different advertisements on television, online, or even the radio as that has worked in the past with other activist groups. We would also probably have to start showing these commercials in major metropolitan areas before moving to smaller towns since more liberal ideas take off better in larger cities. I also liked the idea of trying to teach the youth of our nation the difference, but I think that if we were going to do this we would have to first start by teaching high school students as that did not work out very well for the teacher in the video "Hempsters: Plant the Seed".
Delete