Without media
displaying multiple images defining fashion and top designers for a particular
season, would consumers be more influenced by their community’s perception of
fashion? Would they shop local designers instead of foreign brands? Would this
assist in limiting the environmental issue of mass consumption? As a nation, we
take pride in our individualist culture and strive to be unique; yet our
clothing consumption habits might prove otherwise. We often form our opinions
of popular fashions for each season from different forms of media based off the
styles of others globally. This subsequently leads us to feel as though we are
distinct in fashion, when we are actually very generic. The article Local and Light, by K. Fletcher, states
that as multiple global retailers begin to mass-produce these generic garments
for our consumption, they produce more then what is needed wasting natural
resources and polluting the environment. Fletcher
suggests the idea of shopping locally, explaining that this would allow for
less generic clothing as it would be based around fashion within our community
and history, while making the production process more sustainable.
Fletcher’s
idea is developed from the biomimicry principle, by scientist Janine Benyus,
called shopping locally. Benyus’s principle describes how animals in the
environment cannot import products from other places. She also discusses that
there is a drive for a globally, borderless economy where one product is built
in several nations and sold in a completely different nation. This inspired one
of my concepts for the apparel industry, which would be based around consumers
shopping locally, but still desiring certain garments made from materials that
may not be found within their general region. Although Benyus discusses that
products are solely manufactured locally, I do not believe that it is
completely sustainable for certain crops to be grown in certain areas that are
not natural for their growth, nor do I believe that our country will ever
prohibit foreign trade. This is why my concept would incorporate the idea of
comparative advantage, which defined by Investopedia.com is when one country,
individual, company or region can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost
than a competitor, meaning if America could produce cotton more sustainably
than India; they would grow cotton and India would grow a different crop. All
countries and regions would take comparative advantage into consideration and
develop an agreement as to where a product would grow most sustainably and as
to how the product should be traded among nations. This would allow for
consumers to shop locally purchasing items that are in fashion for their area,
but would also allow them a diverse selection of materials.
Along with the
principle of shopping locally, this concept was also inspired by Benyus’s
principle “Diversify and Cooperate to Fully Use the Habitat.” In this
principle, she describes how animals have “agreements” with one another and at
times their cooperation can be seen as partnerships that are formed to benefit
each other to survive within their habitat. In my concept, the countries have
an agreement with each other as to where it is more sustainable to grow a
particular crop based off of comparative advantage. They also cooperate with
one another by trading these crops in order to make different textiles. From
there, the crops are sold throughout different regions in order for the locally
owned retailers to develop garments that their niches will purchase.
In conclusion,
my concept discusses how comparative advantage, agreements, and trade could
affect our nation in the future as we diversify and cooperate with other
countries to fully use the habitat and begin to shop locally. As sciences
develop more synthetic materials that are sustainable, such as those discussed
by B. Quinn in Textile Futures: Fashion,
Design and Technology, more agreements and policies will need to be created
to trade these materials and their secrets that explain how to develop these
textiles in order for the countries to cooperate with one another efficiently.
Chayla-
ReplyDeleteI like your comparative advantage concept I think this would be an effective action that we could take in order to close the loops in the supply chain. What are some of your ideas regarding the actions that must be taken in order to integrate your design concept into the marketplace? You suggested countries should establish agreements with each other, would this require countries to form new trade agreements and regulations?
In order for this to take place I think we would have to lobby for it and educate people as to why this could be a solution for some of our sustainability issues. This concept probably would require there to be new agreements made between different countries.
DeleteThis is a well thought out concept and I think it would also encourage practices of sustainability, in terms of globalization.
DeleteHi Chayla-
ReplyDeleteGreat opening! I agree, consumers tend to “follow the crowd” with current trends instead of being individualistic and branching out by purchasing items that represent them distinctly. You have created a great concept of comparative advantage. This idea would benefit so many people and help with the issue of waste and overconsumption. In your opinion, do you think it would be a difficult process or somewhat simple to get a vast amount of the countries to come together and work resourcefully? Also, would every country be included or just individual countries that are high in mass-production? I really enjoyed your post this week. This is a great concept!
I think it would be a difficult process getting countries to come together, but with sustainability being such an issue, I think it could happen at some point. I would imagine that everyone would come together because for the most part, every country has some type of crop they can produce and trade. For example, we recently learned that England commonly grew hemp in the past.
DeleteHi, Chayla;
ReplyDeleteI also think this is very interesting and a great application of both principles. Keep up the brainstorming!!
You make a very good point about consumers wanting unique clothing and fashion, yet they go along with all the national styles! I never have thought about that! Great blog!!
ReplyDelete